Yes, it looks like the non-contigious access-list does indeed work.  I've
implemented it
today on a production network with VoIP telephones and haven't (at least
yet) received
any reports of poor voice quality..

The actual access-list used:
access-list 101 permit ip any 10.10.0.200 0.0.7.7 precedence critical

The VoIP phones are mapped at 4th octet IP addresses: 200-207
5 remote sites mapped at 3rd octet IP addresses: 0 thru 4

With just this one access-list, I am able to efficiently classify all VoIP
devices at
all remote sites:

thanks Gaz,
dj


Bikespace wrote:

> Don't think my last post got through, so I'll shorten it now...
>
> I think your address and wildcard mask should be 10.10.0.200 0.0.255.7 (If
> the non-contiguous masks are still accepted).
>
> Regards,
>
> Gaz
>
> ""Bill""  wrote in message
> news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > should work fine.
> >
> > You can also test this out by sending a constant data stream via ftp or
> > something and then start a voice conversation.
> >
> > ""dj""  wrote in message
> > news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > I'm setting up LLQ over hub-'n-spoke frame-relay WAN and want to use
the
> > > following funky looking access-list to mark voice packets for the high
> > > priority queue.  This access-list logically works, but my question is:
> > > Is this legal?
> > > access-list 101 permit ip any 10.10.X.201 0.0.255.248 precedence
> > > critical
> > >
> > > I have 8 IP phones at each remote site starting at 4th octet IP address
> > > of 201 (thru 208).
> > > Each remote site is on a class C network, where the 3rd octet IP
address
> > > labeled X is designated as the site location.
> > > eg: 10.10.1.0/24 is site 1;  10.10.2.0/24 is site 2;    10.10.3.0/24 is
> > > site 3,  etc.
> > >
> > > Will the IOS allow this non-conventional access-list to work per my
> > > intensions?
> > >
> > > regards,
> > > dj




Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=66898&t=66769
--------------------------------------------------
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to