it is strange i used this command many times and my routers never crashed :)
is this only happening on the 2500 platform? and could you tell your "sh ver" regards Devvvv ----- Original Message ----- From: "alaerte Vidali" To: Sent: Thursday, June 05, 2003 10:13 PM Subject: MPLS TE crash the router 2500 [7:70221] > After entering 'tunnel mpls traffic-eng path-option 1 dynamic' the router > crash. > > > The configuration is: > > ip cef > mpls traffic-eng tunnels > ! > interface loopback 0 > ip address 2.2.2.2 255.255.255.255 > ! > interface se 0.23 > ip address 192.168.23.1 255.255.255.255 > mpls traffic-eng tunnels > ip rsvp bandwidth 1000 > ! > router ospf 0 > network 192.168.23.0 0.0.0.255 area 0 > mpls traffic-eng router-id Loopback0 > mpls traffic-eng area 0 > ! > interface tunnel1 > ip unnumbered loopback 0 > tunnel destination 3.3.3.3 > tunnel mode mpls traffic-eng > tunnel mpls traffic-eng bandwidth 100 > tunnel mpls traffic-eng priority 1 1 > > ! > end > > When the command 'tunnel mpls traffic-eng path-option 1 dynamic' is entered, > the following messages appear and it is necessary reload the router > (physically). > > 8w5d: %LINEPROTO-5-UPDOWN: Line protocol on Interface Tunnel1, changed state > to down > 8w5d: %LINK-5-CHANGED: Interface Loopback0, changed state to > administratively down > 8w5d: %LINEPROTO-5-UPDOWN: Line protocol on Interface Loopback0, changed > state to down > 8w5d: %LINK-3-UPDOWN: Interface Loopback0, changed state to up > 8w5d: %LINEPROTO-5-UPDOWN: Line protocol on Interface Loopback0, changed > state to up > 8w5d: %OSPF-5-ADJCHG: Process 1, Nbr 3.3.3.3 on Serial0.23 from EXCHANGE to > DOWN, Neighb > or Down: Interface down or detached > hbor Down: Interface down or detached > 8w5d: %OSPF-4-NONEIGHBOR: Received database description from unknown > neighbor 3.3.3.3 > 8w5d: %OSPF-5-ADJCHG: Process 1, Nbr 3.3.3.3 on Serial0.23 from LOADING to > FULL, Loading > Done > 8w5d: %LINK-3-UPDOWN: Interface Tunnel1, changed state to up > Queued messages:Local Timeout (control reg=0x118) Error, address: 0x20201FE > at 0x34CEA50 > (PC) > > I also tried explicity path; the result is the same. And IS-IS too. > > Any Thoughts? Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=70257&t=70221 -------------------------------------------------- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
