No this is not correct. You should not see an entry of 192.168.0.2 in your route table. All you should see is a route to 192.168.0.2/30 (which means two host addresses).
It looks like you have a subnet mask conflict possibly on the other end. If you want your configuration to be: router 1> 192.168.0.1 router 2> 192.168.0.2 then you need to make sure that both IP addresses have a subnet mask of /30 (255.255.255.252). Generally /32 (or 255.255.255.255) is used for a loopback interface. Since the route is being learned via Serial1/1, I would have someone verify subnet mask info for that interface at the other end of the circuit. You may want to verify your configuration too just to make sure that there are no secondary addresses configured or something strange like that... Thats my perspective... HTH... Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=69636&t=69612 -------------------------------------------------- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
