Hi Maroun,

I have a number of suggestions that you could look into:

-Without the always keyword the ospf router will originate a default route
if there is one in the routing table. So check if you have a default route,
and if not include the always keyword in your default-information orginate
command.

-the route-map keyword specifies the conditions the default route must meet
before being distributed. Hence if you specify a route-map with the match
interface cmd, the default route must have its next-hop interface as the
interface specified in the match interface statement. That could explain why
the default route is not being distributed to any neighbor. It is does not
meet the conditions specified in the route map.

-IMHO, if your ospf neighbor is on a p2p connection you can use the
distibute-list out  cmd and filter out the default route.
But if you have a p2mp configuration, i am not too sure how you would filter
out the default route, for only one of the multipoint peers.

Anyone with any other ideas?

Cheers
GM

""Maroun Waked""  wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> hi,
>
> I have a router running ospf that needs to send a
> default route to its neighbors. For this, I have used
> the command default-information originate.
> Then I wanted one of the neighbors not to receive the
> default route. I thought that the route-map option at
> the end of the default-information originate, would
> help.
> However, each time I create a route-map, the default
> route will not be advertised to any of the neigbors.
> I tried using match interface, but I never got any
> matches.
> In brief, things didn't work.
> Can anyone help
>
> thank you
>
> __________________________________
> Do you Yahoo!?
> The New Yahoo! Search - Faster. Easier. Bingo.
> http://search.yahoo.com




Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=69648&t=69558
--------------------------------------------------
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to