I have seen this too, and like Ian I would normally go with 100/Full
manually configured on botht he Cat and the end device (obviously assuming
both devices support this settings).  In real life, I have often found that
setting the cat to Auto will often lead to duplex / speed mismatches
(especially with Sun kit)  The only time I have made use of Auto is when I
am not 100% sure if the end device support 100MB, some of our legacy
printers are 10MB half duplex, and indeed a number of the 2511's are only
10MB too.]

ian williams wrote:
> 
> This has come up in the ccie written.
> If I understand this subject correctly AUTO , sends out packets
> to try and
> match the 2 devices up with regards to speed and duplex.
> If your getting connection problems this would be a speed
> issue. If its some
> sort of packet loss/error then this could be a duplex problem.
> I have always configured the CAT port manually so there isnt
> any problems.
> 
> Why would you choice AUTO?
> 
> 
> 
> ----- Original Message ----- 
> From: "John Neiberger" 
> To: 
> Sent: Tuesday, May 27, 2003 5:35 PM
> Subject: Re: port/duplex configs [7:69582]
> 
> 
> > >>>> ian williams 5/27/03 10:29:21 AM >>>
> > >I have always configured ports on CAT switch to 100/full
> manually instead
> > of
> > >AUTO.
> > >What is recommended when asked this question for the CCIE
> written. Should
> > >both the end
> > >device ( NIC ) and switch both be configured to 100/FULL?
> >
> > I can't imagine why such a question would be asked on any
> exam since the
> > correct answer is that you configure whatever is necessary to
> establish a
> > connection with the end device.  In my opinion, you should
> always use AUTO
> > unless this causes problems, in which case you hard-set your
> devices to
> > 100/HALF, not 100/FULL.  If you'd like the rationale for that
> I refer you
> to
> > the archives for my previous rantings on this subject.
> >
> > I'd fall over in shock if you were to be asked a question
> like this on
> your
> > exam, but as long as you understand the issues involved you
> should be
> > adequately prepared for whatever question of this type that
> they throw at
> > you.
> >
> > Regards,
> > John
> 
> 


Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=69660&t=69582
--------------------------------------------------
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to