""Ken Diliberto"" wrote in message news:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > With the Sup IV, you could use the 4507R chassis and have the ability to > use redundant supervisors in the future. I think the switching speed of > the Sup IV is faster and you can do L3 as well. Things the Sup II can't > do.
Uh, I think you're talking about the SupII, but the guy is asking about the SupII+. The SupII+ can be used redundantly and can do (basic) L3 switching. The difference between the Sup4 and the SupII+ is that the Sup4 can handle advanced routing protocols (anything beyond RIP) and has more processing power, RAM, and flash, and can therefore handle more adjacency entries, more VLANs, etc. etc. If you can get away with just using static routes and/or RIP and you're not pushing your switch very much, then you could save money by getting the SupII+. I know some guys who are using the SupII+ and they report no issues. I have a number of people report issues with the Sup4. > > >>> "Johns, John A." 07/11/03 12:14PM >>> > Wanted to get some feedback from some folks that are using either the > Sup > II+ card or the Sup IV card.. > > There is over a $3,000.00 difference in cost.. > > Anybody using the SUP II+? Any issues? > > Thanks, > John A. Johns, CCIE No. 7983, CCDP, CCNP, MCSE, MCSA, MCP+I, CCA, A+ > [snip] Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=72172&t=72156 -------------------------------------------------- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
