"... and Bayesian classifier. If the product believes a message is spam it will create a report explaining why it is spam and place the original message as an attachment."
Bayesian filters are best used on a per-user basis, especially if you have some users that subscribe to "weird" groups, like [EMAIL PROTECTED] For example, a company-wide Bayesian filter would never work in my industry (healthcare) as a lot of doctors get messages about topics that would otherwise be classified as SPAM from an adult web site. As far as getting a message for each suspected SPAM, that would just kill me, as I get hundreds of SPAMs a day. I'd suggest Junk-Out, from www.junk-out.com. Fred Reimer - CCNA Eclipsys Corporation, 200 Ashford Center North, Atlanta, GA 30338 Phone: 404-847-5177 Cell: 770-490-3071 Pager: 888-260-2050 NOTICE; This email contains confidential or proprietary information which may be legally privileged. It is intended only for the named recipient(s). If an addressing or transmission error has misdirected the email, please notify the author by replying to this message. If you are not the named recipient, you are not authorized to use, disclose, distribute, copy, print or rely on this email, and should immediately delete it from your computer. -----Original Message----- From: Paul Borghese [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, July 14, 2003 9:31 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: SPAM Filtering [7:72265] Joe, Look at SpamAssassin (http://www.spamassassin.org). I was a little skeptical but it really does work ... especially if you use the blacklist checks and Bayesian classifier. If the product believes a message is spam it will create a report explaining why it is spam and place the original message as an attachment. It will also change the subject and add some simple X-headers so you can sort your mail based upon the subject or header. I have Outlook dump all spam messages in a separate folder. Then about once a day I go in and quickly delete the spam. I went from so much spam that legitimate e-mails were being lost to spam is not a problem. It has had such a high level of accuracy that I am considering have the messages delete at the server instead of downloading then deleting. I have not done so maybe because deep down I get some sort of weird satisfaction watching all of the spam mail I receive being dumped harmlessly into it's own directory then in one quick flick of the wrist deleting it all. I am assuming you are using a Unix/Linux based mail server. I have no idea if it will work on a Windows 2000 server platform. Oh, and I forgot the best point ... it is FREE! Good luck, Paul Borghese -----Original Message----- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Joseph R. Taylor Sent: Monday, July 14, 2003 4:48 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: OT: SPAM Filtering [7:72265] Team, Our company is being bothered by SPAM. We only have about fifty employees. I need to look into SPAM filtering. I don't know if we'd benefit from an hardware appliance along with a content filter. Perhaps, WebSense and applications of this nature would be good. I'd appreciate hearing from anyone that has working knowledge of these applications. Thank you, JoeT CCNP Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=72299&t=72299 -------------------------------------------------- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
