Can you see any mistake in the following network?
Rx ---area 5------R2----area 0-------R3-------------
| |
area 0 |
| |
Ry ---area 5------R1-------------------------area 0--
R1, R2 and R3 are connected through area 0.
R1 and R2 are ABRs for area 5.
I am wondering if R1 and R2 should be connected through area 5 for a better
design.
The bad situation I see is that Rx and Ry will have different databases,
although they are in the same area. From the routing table standpoint there
will be conectivity.
Any Thoughts?
Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=72587&t=72587
--------------------------------------------------
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
