No, I won't think that these mails are sent by some person. I have a rule on
my outlook application which sends all mails addressed to
[EMAIL PROTECTED] to a specific folder, but this one is directly coming to
my Inbox, so I feel that it will be a Server or mailing application
(Majordomo I believe) bug, which is sending personally addressed blank mails
to some or all the list members.

Just my point though.

Vikram

-----Original Message-----
From: Antero Vasconcelos
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 7/25/03 3:51 PM
Subject: RE: NOBODY emails [7:72997]

I4m just beeing tired of that person.

antero

-----Original Message-----
From: Taufik Kurniawan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: sexta-feira, 25 de Julho de 2003 07:15
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: NOBODY emails [7:72997]


I got .. about 10 emails


At 03:56 25/07/2003 +0000, Puckette, Larry (TIFPC) wrote:
>Is anybody else receiving multiple emails from [EMAIL PROTECTED]
that
>are empty??
>
>Larry Puckette
>Network Analyst
>Temple Inland
>[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>512-434-1838
>Where there is no idol but money and power, there is no hope for
integrity.
>
>  -----Original Message-----
>From:   Maximus  [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Sent:   Thursday, July 24, 2003 9:02 PM
>To:     [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Subject:        RE: Vty access class [7:72990]
>
>I believe the standard ACL should be enough since your already
specifying
>transport input ssh on line vty 0 4.
>
>Just my $0.02
>
>Jablonski, Michael wrote:
> >
> > I'm having a bit of trouble with extended access-lists for vty
> > access.
> > Basically I'd like to setup an extended access list that only
> > allows ssh
> > access from certain IPs, but after creating the list and
> > applying it to the
> > VTY I lose access.  But if I use a standard acl only allowing
> > certain IPs it
> > works fine...
> >
> > ip access-list extended local_shell
> >   permit tcp host 192.168.1.2 host 192.168.1.1 eq 22
> >
> > vty 0 4
> > access-class local_shell in
> > transport input ssh
> >
> > Is the standard enough & is the above over-kill?
> >
> > Thanx,
> > mkj
************************************************************************
***
Este email assim como os ficheiros que possa ter em anexo sao
confidenciais
e para uso exclusivo da pessoa ou organizacao para o qual foi enviado.
Se
recebeu esta mensagem por engano por favor notifique a Compta atraves do
endereco [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Esta mensagem foi verificada pelo sistema MAILsweeper nao tendo sido
encontrados virus. http://www.mimesweeper.com

MAILsweeper - Modulo da suite MIMEsweeper, solucao de filtragem de
conteudos
comercializada pela Compta SA.

A Compta SA detem o mais alto nivel de especializacao MIMEsweeper, tendo
sido reconhecida pela Clearswift como Premier Partner.
************************************************************************
***
This message is confidential and may contain privileged information
intended
solely for the named addressee(s). It may not be used or disclosed
except
for the purpose for which it has been sent.

If you are not the intended recipient, you must not copy, distribute or
take
any action in reliance on it. If you have received this message in
error,
please notify Compta by emailing [EMAIL PROTECTED] quoting the sender
and
delete the message and any attached documents.

This footnote confirms that this email message has been swept by
MIMEsweeper
for Content Security threats, including computer viruses
************************************************************************
***




Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=73019&t=72997
--------------------------------------------------
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to