ios bug has hit the mailing lists too...
----- Original Message ----- From: "Antero Vasconcelos" Date: Friday, July 25, 2003 4:21 pm Subject: RE: NOBODY emails [7:72997] > I4m just beeing tired of that person. > > antero > > -----Original Message----- > From: Taufik Kurniawan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: sexta-feira, 25 de Julho de 2003 07:15 > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Re: NOBODY emails [7:72997] > > > I got .. about 10 emails > > > At 03:56 25/07/2003 +0000, Puckette, Larry (TIFPC) wrote: > >Is anybody else receiving multiple emails from > [EMAIL PROTECTED] that > >are empty?? > > > >Larry Puckette > >Network Analyst > >Temple Inland > >[EMAIL PROTECTED] > >512-434-1838 > >Where there is no idol but money and power, there is no hope for > integrity.> > > -----Original Message----- > >From: Maximus [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > >Sent: Thursday, July 24, 2003 9:02 PM > >To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > >Subject: RE: Vty access class [7:72990] > > > >I believe the standard ACL should be enough since your already > specifying>transport input ssh on line vty 0 4. > > > >Just my $0.02 > > > >Jablonski, Michael wrote: > > > > > > I'm having a bit of trouble with extended access-lists for vty > > > access. > > > Basically I'd like to setup an extended access list that only > > > allows ssh > > > access from certain IPs, but after creating the list and > > > applying it to the > > > VTY I lose access. But if I use a standard acl only allowing > > > certain IPs it > > > works fine... > > > > > > ip access-list extended local_shell > > > permit tcp host 192.168.1.2 host 192.168.1.1 eq 22 > > > > > > vty 0 4 > > > access-class local_shell in > > > transport input ssh > > > > > > Is the standard enough & is the above over-kill? > > > > > > Thanx, > > > mkj > ************************************************************************ *** > Este email assim como os ficheiros que possa ter em anexo sao > confidenciaise para uso exclusivo da pessoa ou organizacao para o > qual foi enviado. Se > recebeu esta mensagem por engano por favor notifique a Compta > atraves do > endereco [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Esta mensagem foi verificada pelo sistema MAILsweeper nao tendo sido > encontrados virus. http://www.mimesweeper.com > > MAILsweeper - Modulo da suite MIMEsweeper, solucao de filtragem de > conteudoscomercializada pela Compta SA. > > A Compta SA detem o mais alto nivel de especializacao MIMEsweeper, > tendosido reconhecida pela Clearswift como Premier Partner. > ************************************************************************ *** > This message is confidential and may contain privileged > information intended > solely for the named addressee(s). It may not be used or disclosed > exceptfor the purpose for which it has been sent. > > If you are not the intended recipient, you must not copy, > distribute or take > any action in reliance on it. If you have received this message in > error,please notify Compta by emailing [EMAIL PROTECTED] > quoting the sender and > delete the message and any attached documents. > > This footnote confirms that this email message has been swept by > MIMEsweeperfor Content Security threats, including computer viruses > ************************************************************************ *** > Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] ----------------------------------------- (on sprinter) The information contained in this email is confidential and is meant to be read only by the person to whom it is addressed.Please visit http://www.millenniumit.com/legal/email.htm to read the entire confidentiality clause. --------------------------------------------------------- Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=73021&t=72997 -------------------------------------------------- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
