At 6:24 AM +0000 8/3/03, Zsombor Papp wrote: >Howard C. Berkowitz wrote: >> When you consider interface buffers are allocated to each >> subinterface > >Which command displays information about the buffers allocated to the >subinterfaces?
Zsombor, interesting observation. I will have to check it; there may have been an IOS change. I _know_ I've run out of buffers on 2500s under IOS 11x by assigning too many p2p subinterfaces. If the IOS has changed to buffer on a physical interface basis only, that may bring up different performance issues as a large number of subinterfaces contend for a limited number of buffers. > >XXX#sh ip int br | inc Serial >Serial4/0 unassigned YES manual up >up >Serial4/0.3 172.168.1.1 YES manual up >up >Serial4/0.4 172.168.1.5 YES manual up >up >Serial4/1 unassigned YES manual administratively down >down >Serial4/2 unassigned YES manual administratively down >down >Serial4/3 unassigned YES manual administratively down >down >XXX#sh buffer | inc Serial >Serial4/0 buffers, 512 bytes (total 96, permanent 96): >Serial4/1 buffers, 512 bytes (total 96, permanent 96): >Serial4/2 buffers, 512 bytes (total 96, permanent 96): >Serial4/3 buffers, 512 bytes (total 96, permanent 96): >XXX# I also remember the buffers in question to be 10 per subinterface, and around 1600 bytes. I wonder if we are thinking of two different pools? Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=73451&t=73431 -------------------------------------------------- **Please support GroupStudy by purchasing from the GroupStudy Store: http://shop.groupstudy.com FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
