No, there is nothing incongruous here. You add the static route for the
default route which tells the router that "if you don't know where the
destination is, just shove it out over here". Lammle has to use the two
static route commands because router B is in the middle of two networks. So
when router B doesn't know of the destination it has to shove the packet out
two sides so that each of the other networks can take a look at it and
decide what to do with it.

It is this kind of confusion that leads to the use of synamic protocols
rather than static routes.

Adam Hickey
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

----- Original Message -----
From: "Dave Page" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "'Cisco List'" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Monday, August 07, 2000 5:05 PM
Subject: IP classless/Default routes


>
> In Todd Lammle's book for CCNA 640-407, on p. 202 he has set a default
route
> of BOTH 172.16.40.2 and 172.16.20.1.  How does one do this, just enter the
> IP route command as such, one right after the other (??):
>
> ip route 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 162.16.40.2
> ip route 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 162.16.20.1
>
> ???
>
>
> The reason I ask is that in his book for CCNA 640-507, he states on page
> 253, "Default routing is used to send packets with a remote destination
> network not in the routing table to the next hop router.  You can only use
> default routing on stub networks, which means that they have only one exit
> port out of the network."
>
> The two books seem to say contradictory things.  Is it because the 507
exam
> is based on a different IOS?  What gives?
>
>
> Dave Page
>
> ___________________________________
> UPDATED Posting Guidelines: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/guide.html
> FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com
> Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>

___________________________________
UPDATED Posting Guidelines: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/guide.html
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to