Well from my understanding a subinterface would be better from an
administrative point of view. I.E. Say you want to run two IPX networks on
the same physical interface using the secondary command. If you where to
change the encapulation on the phsyical interface you would affect all IPX
networks. Now if you where to have a subinterface this can be avoided. The
IOS sees these subinterfaces and different logical interfces on the same
physical interface. To round it up, you can perform differnt functions on
a subinterface. IF you where to use the secondary, anything you change to
affect the interface would affect that secondary addres bound to it.
Group correct me if i'm wrong, or sorta right. I'm kinda new at this :)
--
Regards,
-----------------------------------
Marco Paulo Rodrigues
Unix Administrator
Axxent Corporation
Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
CompTia: A+, Network+, i-Net+
Cisco: CCDA
-----------------------------------
"GOD is mankind's finest creation."
- Marco Rodrigues
"Virtually All Internet Porno flows through the systems of one
company. Cisco Systems. Imporning the Internet Generation."
- Marco Rodrigues
On Mon, 14 Aug 2000, Frank Jordan wrote:
> Under what circumstance should we choose one of them but not the other?
>
>
> Thanks in advance.
>
>
> ___________________________________
> UPDATED Posting Guidelines: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/guide.html
> FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com
> Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
___________________________________
UPDATED Posting Guidelines: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/guide.html
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
