I do not think Cisco would discontinue the use of secondary IP addresses. There are so many different uses for them and it seems (at least in my experience) that every network hack out there always uses them --- not that i necessarily always like them--- but if you customers use it and need it there is no reason to remove it....... my 50 cents (unable to the sense key) Briggs wrote: > um...I think cisco stated that secondary addresses will not be supported in > some future IOS releases, so...... that's a decent reason not to use them. > > "Frank Jordan" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message > 8n8um0$5cn$[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:8n8um0$5cn$[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > > Under what circumstance should we choose one of them but not the other? > > > > > > Thanks in advance. > > > > > > ___________________________________ > > UPDATED Posting Guidelines: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/guide.html > > FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com > > Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > --- > > ___________________________________ > UPDATED Posting Guidelines: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/guide.html > FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com > Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
begin:vcard n:Wollman;William x-mozilla-html:FALSE adr:;;;;;; version:2.1 email;internet:[EMAIL PROTECTED] fn:William V. Wollman end:vcard
