A potential employer (an ISP) told me that they need to deploy a project to
enable network access to remote users. He mentioned they are considering
Aironet. Probably the distance is the key factor: if you are in a building
Aironet will provide wireless connectivity.
I mentioned VPNs because I thought VPNs could also be a solution to provide
connections between mobile or remote users with their corporate networks via
a third-party network such as a service provider ... (and please correct me
if I am wrong)
----- Original Message -----
From: "Priscilla Oppenheimer" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Billy Monroe" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Saturday, August 19, 2000 4:05 PM
Subject: Re: Aironet vs. VPN
> How far are they roaming? Aironet is a LAN solution. You can only go
> approximately 150 feet, depending on obstacles.
>
> I might be missing something, but VPNs and Aironet don't even seem to
> belong in the same category. Maybe if you tell us more about your
> application, we can provide more info.
>
> Priscilla
>
> At 12:51 PM 8/19/00, Billy Monroe wrote:
> >Anyone could tell me in which occasion I could deploy VPNs (to provide
> >connectivity to roaming users) instead Cisco Aironet ?
> >
> >Thanks a lot,
> >
> >Billy
> >CCNA, Compaq ASE
> >
> >
> >
> >___________________________________
> >UPDATED Posting Guidelines: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/guide.html
> >FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com
> >Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>
> ________________________
>
> Priscilla Oppenheimer
> http://www.priscilla.com
>
>
___________________________________
UPDATED Posting Guidelines: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/guide.html
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
