I too am not a salesman, I am an engineer but..... We sell a camera server
(4ports 1 for each camera if you want 4). The server is the size of an
external modem and get this..... you can pan tilt and zoom all controlled
over the web. You can use your browser to get into the server and control
all 4 camera's. We also have a camera that you can web directly into, but it
is fixed. You place these suckers anywhere on your Lan and use you web
browser to access the video or control them.  Most of our customers are
doing this over 56k dialup and getting up to 3 frames a second on
controllable cameras and 5 frames a sec on fixed cameras. If you have DSL
the frame rate is even better. We store the images on disc and then send out
a cd rom to our customers weekly with the video captures.



----- Original Message -----
From: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Tuesday, August 29, 2000 11:13 AM
Subject: RE: Video conferencing over IP question


> First off, this isn't a sales pitch, I'm an engineer but I felt like I
just
> HAD to reply.
>
> RE: your issue about video conferencing using 3 multilinked ISDN lines,
> Broadwing sells a frame circuit that goes into our ip cloud and connects
to
> a Nortel BSN box also known as a "Shasta" box.  This box does firewalling,
> sets up ipSec tunnels, routes, etc. etc., whole lots of stuff.  We are
also
> supporting video conferencing services off these circuits because we can
> provide COS (class of service) by ip address via our Cisco GSX (12016)
> platforms.  We also sell a Sony h.323 camera that has a 10BaseT connection
> on the back and can talk to like cameras or to ISDN based systems
> (Picturetel, Polycom) via a third party site.  So...., video ain't just
for
> ISDN anymore.
>
> If anyone wants to know more, email me offline.
>
> Bob Schussler, CCNA, CNE5
> Sales Engineer
> Broadwing / Indianapolis
> 317-469-3719
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Jeff Walzer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Monday, August 28, 2000 12:35 PM
> To: 'Cisco'
> Subject: Video conferencing over IP question
>
>
> We are building a Frame Relay network from scratch. We have 2 main offices
> and around 8 remote offices. For equipment the four main offices will have
> 3640s and the 4 remote offices will have 2620s. Two of the main offices
will
> 100 + users while the other two will have 25 + users. The remaining remote
> offices will have 5-10 users. We currently run 3 ISDN lines into each
office
> for video conferencing and the phone bills are quite expensive.
>
> We are looking into running video conferencing over the Frame network and
my
> question concerns what switch I should install in the offices. Right now I
> am looking at the 3548 XL at two of the main offices with 2924 XL switches
> for the rest of the offices. If video conferencing over IP becomes a
reality
> in 6 months I was thinking about adding a 5000 series switch at the main
> site to have a core/distribution layer with the 3548 XLs serving as the
> access layer. I am concerned about the 2924 XLs in the four remote
offices.
> Should I look into the 3524 XL series for the remote offices to be able to
> handle the video conferencing traffic?
>
> Thanks,
> Jeff
>
> ___________________________________
> UPDATED Posting Guidelines: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/guide.html
> FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com
> Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> ___________________________________
> UPDATED Posting Guidelines: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/guide.html
> FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com
> Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>

___________________________________
UPDATED Posting Guidelines: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/guide.html
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to