>My last post wasn't worded right, sorry.
>10.1.1.1 255.255.00 = 10.1.1.1/16 O.K.
>10.1.1.1 0.255.255.0 =?????????? or
>10.1.1.1 170.170.170.170 =???????
>HOW would a person simplify this to a network address with a / ?
>Again, if these unusual subnet masks don't work, then this point is null.
>Thanks gang,
>Dale CCNA?
Dale,
you've given the precise reason RFC1812 forbids such masks. They
break CIDR/aggregation/summarization.
Subnet masks, if you will, are a simple language. In another
language, wE cAn SaY wE cAN capITALize ANYwhere WE want, but it
doesn't help understandability.
___________________________________
UPDATED Posting Guidelines: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/guide.html
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
