RE: Load balancing two T1 of two ISPRipped out html....
If you dont want to translate on the outbound do the following...
!
interface whatever1
ip address 1.1.1.1 255.0.0.0
ip nat inside
ip route-cache policy
ip policy route-map nonatout
......
route-map nonatout permit 10
match ip address 120
set ip next-hop 192.168.0.2
......
interface Loopback1
ip address 192.168.0.1 255.255.255.252
......
access-list 120 permit ip host 1.1.1.1 any
This will make packets go via lo1, which doesn't have nat invoked on it as
the 192.168.0 net is not in your nat access-list
There are other ways of doing it. You could set a route map on your nat pool
and tie that to access-lists also
Hope that helps
Andy Lennon
ccnp/dp/msce
"Jin Tam" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
Well, this is what I found when I tested it. You can do multiple static
mappings with the "ip nat ,,, extendable". The only problem is getting the
outgoing packets from 1.1.1.1 from being translated (1 packet will go out as
2.2.2.1 the next will go out as 2.2.2.2 then 2.2.2.1 and so on).
-----Original Message-----
From: Andrew Larkins [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, September 07, 2000 8:59 AM
To: E A Moran; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: IP NAT
I tried this once and it does not work.... For a static nat to work the
internal ip is translated to one valid external ip.. When I tried to do
exactly as you mentioned I got an error message that the internal ip is
already mapped .
I have a server with an internal IP address of 1.1.1.1 and I have 2 external
addresses 2.2.2.1 and 2.2.2.2.
How can I translate incoming destination addresses 2.2.2.1 and 2.2.2.2 to
1.1.1.1 while keeping outgoing packets from 1.1.1.1 from being translated.
Thanks in advance.
___________________________________
UPDATED Posting Guidelines: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/guide.html
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
