If there are no redundant links, then static routing will be faster.
If there is a redundant link, Dynamic routing will give the benefit of fault
tolerance.
----Original Message Follows----
From: jeongwoo park <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Reply-To: jeongwoo park <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: static route question ??
Date: Mon, 11 Sep 2000 07:54:54 -0700 (PDT)
HI all.
Situation:
There is a central site in San Francisco, and four
branches around Bay area.
Since static route gives us faster traffic
transmission, would it be the most desirable way to
configure static route on all routers, regardless
whether it is a central site router or branch office
router?
If not, why not?
Thanks in adv.
jeongwoo
__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Yahoo! Mail - Free email you can access from anywhere!
http://mail.yahoo.com/
**NOTE: New CCNA/CCDA List has been formed. For more information go to
http://www.groupstudy.com/list/Associates.html
_________________________________
UPDATED Posting Guidelines: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/guide.html
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
_________________________________________________________________________
Get Your Private, Free E-mail from MSN Hotmail at http://www.hotmail.com.
Share information about yourself, create your own public profile at
http://profiles.msn.com.
**NOTE: New CCNA/CCDA List has been formed. For more information go to
http://www.groupstudy.com/list/Associates.html
_________________________________
UPDATED Posting Guidelines: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/guide.html
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
