A co-worker has seen this and it is a bug.  He didn't remember the version
number(s) affected.

Rodgers Moore

""BE"" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
8ptc7v$7a1$[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:8ptc7v$7a1$[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> Rodgers,
>
> Hi!  Thanks for your response.
>
> The answer is YES to all of your questions.  The really strange thing is,
> when I leave the single PIX 510 running for an extended period of time, it
> works great, no problems.  When I add the second PIX, it just seems to
grab
> the DMZ connection (but leaves the other two connections alone).  My
> original guess was that there is some strange bug in 4.4 somewhere that I
> havent seen.
>
> Both boxes have the same config (and are sync'd up).
>
> -B
> ""Rodgers Moore"" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
> 8ptbav$4fn$[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:8ptbav$4fn$[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> > It sounds like they're both identical.  That's good.
> > Do you have ALL the interfaces in an UP state? and each pair of
interfaces
> > are on the same hub?
> >
> > A down interface will be considered a failure....
> >
> > Both configs are identical? You power cycled both boxes at the same
time?
> >
> > Rodgers Moore
> >
> > ""BE"" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
8pt9cl$t1g$[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:8pt9cl$t1g$[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> > > Hey gang!  Any Pix gurus out there?
> > >
> > > I've been playing with a couple of Pixs (510s) trying to get the
> failover
> > to
> > > work.  I thought it would be a piece of cake, but it just isn't
showing
> me
> > > any love.  Ive got (2) Pix 510s that each have 3 NICs in them
(internal,
> > > untrusted, DMZ) each running 4.4.  Everything seems all fine and dandy
> > until
> > > about 10 minutes later when the standby PIX starts stealing the DMZ
> > > connections.
> > >
> > > Any thoughts?
> > >
> > > -Brad
> > > bellis@opts ys.net
> > >
> > > used cisco hardware:  www.opt sys.net
> > > cisco hardware newsgroup:   news://news.opts ys.net/cisco.hardware
> > >
> > >
> > > **NOTE: New CCNA/CCDA List has been formed. For more information go to
> > > http://www.groupstudy.com/list/Associates.html
> > > _________________________________
> > > UPDATED Posting Guidelines: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/guide.html
> > > FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com
> > > Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > >
> >
> >
> > **NOTE: New CCNA/CCDA List has been formed. For more information go to
> > http://www.groupstudy.com/list/Associates.html
> > _________________________________
> > UPDATED Posting Guidelines: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/guide.html
> > FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com
> > Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >
>
>
>
>
> **NOTE: New CCNA/CCDA List has been formed. For more information go to
> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/Associates.html
> _________________________________
> UPDATED Posting Guidelines: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/guide.html
> FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com
> Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>


**NOTE: New CCNA/CCDA List has been formed. For more information go to
http://www.groupstudy.com/list/Associates.html
_________________________________
UPDATED Posting Guidelines: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/guide.html
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to