Try to tracert before and after you ping a host on the WAN.  I don't know
how you're setup but if the ping is activiting the WAN link and the WAN
routes have lower admin cost then your traffic may be taking a circuitous
route through the WAN to reach the hosts.

Steve Brokaw, MCSE CCNA CCNP
Sprint Enterprise Network Services (BUT LOOKING!!!)

-----Original Message-----
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of
Justin Vo
Sent: Thursday, September 21, 2000 11:20 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: slow ping response to ethernet hosts but not serial
interfaces


Thank you for the suggestion but it does not have any debug enable.

>From the router on the same LAN, ping is fast  but across the WAN link to a
host then it's slow. Very strange.

Any others suggestions ? or extra information required ?


Ta


"Rodgers Moore" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
8qeidp$hh7$[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:8qeidp$hh7$[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> Try this at the enable prompt of both routers:  "undebug all"
>
> The last time I saw poor performance for no apparent reason, I found a
debug
> ip packet running. OK, OK, I admit it! _I_ was the one who left it
running.
> :)
>
> Rodgers Moore
>
> ""Justin Vo"" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
> 8qe9no$nmv$[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:8qe9no$nmv$[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> > Hi,
> >
> > I'm having trouble of identify what's wrong when I'm pinging a host on a
> > small network. I'm getting an average of 150ms of response time. The WAN
> > link is 2MB microwave and not being utilised at this stage. Pinging the
> > serial interfaces give me average of 2ms only. Even when I'm pinging the
> > f0/0 of the router, I'm getting the same response as pinging a host on
the
> > same network.
> >
> > I already make sure fast switching is enable (default anyway) and the
two
> > routers are 2620 and 3620 with very low utilisation.
> >
> > Any suggestions ?
> >
> > Thanks
> > Justin Vo
> > [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >
> >
> > **NOTE: New CCNA/CCDA List has been formed. For more information go to
> > http://www.groupstudy.com/list/Associates.html
> > _________________________________
> > UPDATED Posting Guidelines: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/guide.html
> > FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com
> > Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >
>
>
> **NOTE: New CCNA/CCDA List has been formed. For more information go to
> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/Associates.html
> _________________________________
> UPDATED Posting Guidelines: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/guide.html
> FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com
> Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>


**NOTE: New CCNA/CCDA List has been formed. For more information go to
http://www.groupstudy.com/list/Associates.html
_________________________________
UPDATED Posting Guidelines: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/guide.html
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]

**NOTE: New CCNA/CCDA List has been formed. For more information go to
http://www.groupstudy.com/list/Associates.html
_________________________________
UPDATED Posting Guidelines: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/guide.html
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to