There must be some misunderstanding here....Cisco's DNS/DHCP software runs
on an NT server and is not router based! The software is very robust and
has an easy understandable UI...The question was which was better Microsoft
or Cisco...for us Cisco's was b/c it gives us DDNS and "failover" capability
for our DNS/DHCP servers which is not built into the Microsoft version....
----- Original Message -----
From: "Jeff Kell" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Chris Boyd" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Sunday, October 08, 2000 7:25 AM
Subject: Re: which is better ?
> Router-based DHCP is often used for home/SOHO environments with NAT
> overload to get many machines over a single serial line, especially in
> conjunction with, for instance, 'ip address negotiated' on a Dialer
> interface. The Inside interfaces generate DHCP using the negotiated
> serial interface.
>
> On a larger scale, other options are much better.
>
> Jeff Kell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
**NOTE: New CCNA/CCDA List has been formed. For more information go to
http://www.groupstudy.com/list/Associates.html
_________________________________
UPDATED Posting Guidelines: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/guide.html
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
