Something to add
When i tired to do away the "IP NAT INSIDE" on FA1/0, all the traffic from
FE1/0 can't get out to anwhere outside Serial 1/0...ping & traceroute all
failed
"GNOME" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
8sch47$d9d$[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:8sch47$d9d$[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> Hi
>
> Pls see the following sample config
>
> int serial1/0
> ip address 200.10.10.1 255.255.255.252
> ip nat outside
>
> int fastethernet 0/0
> ip address 172.16.0.1 255.255.255.0
> ip nat inside
>
> int fastethernet 1/0
> ip address 201.0.0.1 255.255.255.0
> ip nat inside
> !
> ip nat pool provider 203.100.100.150 203.100.100.180 netmask 255.255.255.0
> ip nat inside source list 5 pool provider overload
> !
> access-list 5 permit 172.16.0.0 0.15.255.255
>
> Question 1
> if someone access a server (201.0.0.2) coming into Serial 1/0, will the
> router translate the destination ip address?
>
> Question 2
> Like wise, if the return traffic from 201.0.0.2 going out from Serial 1/0,
> will the ip get translated?
>
> Personally i feel it will not but i have been getting funny result like
when
> outside do a NS Lookup the server, he will get some IP address from the
NAT
> pool.
>
> If i don't put "IP NAT INSIDE" at Fastethernet 1/0, when i try to ping
(for
> example) from 201.0.0.2 going out from Serial 1/0, seems like cannot ping
>
> Any advice will be greatly appreciated.
>
>
> Regards
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>
>
> _________________________________
> FAQ, list archives, and subscription info:
http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
> Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
_________________________________
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
