On 15 Oct 2000 11:05:44 -0400, GNOME <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
:Hi
:
:Pls see the following sample config
:
:int serial1/0
: ip address 200.10.10.1 255.255.255.252
: ip nat outside
:
:int fastethernet 0/0
: ip address 172.16.0.1 255.255.255.0
: ip nat inside
:
:int fastethernet 1/0
: ip address 201.0.0.1 255.255.255.0
: ip nat inside
:!
:ip nat pool provider 203.100.100.150 203.100.100.180 netmask 255.255.255.0
:ip nat inside source list 5 pool provider overload
:!
:access-list 5 permit 172.16.0.0 0.15.255.255
:
:Question 1
:if someone access a server (201.0.0.2) coming into Serial 1/0, will the
:router translate the destination ip address?
:
:Question 2
:Like wise, if the return traffic from 201.0.0.2 going out from Serial 1/0,
:will the ip get translated?
:
:Personally i feel it will not but i have been getting funny result like when
:outside do a NS Lookup the server, he will get some IP address from the NAT
:pool.
:
:If i don't put "IP NAT INSIDE" at Fastethernet 1/0, when i try to ping (for
:example) from 201.0.0.2 going out from Serial 1/0, seems like cannot ping
:
:Any advice will be greatly appreciated.
:
:
:Regards
:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
:
:
:
:_________________________________
:FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
:Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
:
--
Jay Hennigan - Network Administration - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
NetLojix Communications, Inc. NASDAQ: NETX - http://www.netlojix.com/
WestNet: Connecting you to the planet. 805 884-6323
_________________________________
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
