well, you can consider the GNS filter too,
the input sap and outsap filter will help sometime but no always
----- Original Message -----
From: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Monday, October 23, 2000 9:50 PM
Subject: Fwd: Re: IPX
> If you simply wish to filter out all updates *except* the Netware file
servers you can
> use an output sap filter on the wan interface of *each* router. (I am
assuming that you
> have IOS feature sets on your routers which support IPX.) For example:
>
> Router A
> ----------------------------------------
> ipx routing
>
> access-list 1001 permit -1 4
> access-list 1001 deny -1 <------ not necessary due to implicit deny
but I prefer to
> have it in there for readability
>
> interface s 0
> ipx network AC
> ipx output-sap-filter 1001
>
> interface e 0
> ipx network A
>
> -----------------------------------------
>
> After you implement the output sap filter, wait 60 seconds and do a show
ipx servers.
> The non-server entries for the remote sites should go away. Check out the
link below for
> more information.
>
> http://www.cisco.com/warp/public/701/34.html
>
> As for implementing IPX EIGRP, this would depend on the speed of your WAN
links and the
> amount of required (i.e. servers) SAP traffic. Using IPX/RIP, it takes 480
bytes every
> 60 seconds to advertise 7 SAP services. If you have fast links and a
small amount of
> required SAP traffic then implementing IPX EIGRP might be unnecessary. If
on the other
> hand you have lots of required SAP traffic I would definitely implement
IPX EIGRP. If
> you do setup it up, don't forget to disable IPX/RIP for the WAN
interfaces. For example:
>
> Router A
> -------------------
> ipx routing
>
> int e 0
> ipx network A
>
> int s 0
> ipx network AC
>
> ipx router eigrp 100
> network AC
> network A
>
> ipx router rip
> no network AC
>
> --------------------------------------
>
> Hope this helps,
> Sandy Turnage
>
> SH Wesson wrote:
>
> > In regards to ipx routing, how and when do we determine if running ipx
> > routing is enough as compare to when to run ipx eigrp routing? My
> > environment is growing from about 100 sap listings to maybe 2000 sap
> > listings via a company merger.
> >
> > My second question is via the following diagram
> >
> > Site A ---- Site B ---- Site C
> >
> > Currently, IP traffic is going between Site A, B, and C. IPX is running
> > locally within each site but not routed to other sites. I wanted to
have
> > Site A and Site C to be able to talk IPX in order to see Novell servers
on
> > each site by enabling IPX routing. Site A has about 100 sap listings,
Site
> > B has about 2000 sap listings, and site C has about 750 sap listings.
In
> > enabling ipx routing across from A to C, how can I go about such that
Site A
> > only certain server sap advertisements from Site C. Basically, I only
want
> > to be able to see servers across A and C and don't need to see ipx
enabled
> > clients. Also, in this type of environment with the above number os sap
> > listings, should I just use ipx routing or should I use "ipx eigrp"?
> >
> > Thanks.
> >
_________________________________________________________________________
> > Get Your Private, Free E-mail from MSN Hotmail at
http://www.hotmail.com.
> >
> > Share information about yourself, create your own public profile at
> > http://profiles.msn.com.
> >
> > _________________________________
> > FAQ, list archives, and subscription info:
http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
> > Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> _________________________________
> FAQ, list archives, and subscription info:
http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
> Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>
_________________________________
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
