I believe you made the point, but can you confirm that your routing clns with your
IS-IS config? And if so, are you looking to block the clnp routes from the other
routers? or all Interface(s) on each router ? Can you clarify? There also seems to
be some dual isis going on (router A?B?) Thanks
Pete
*********** REPLY SEPARATOR ***********
On 11/15/2000 at 3:22 PM McCallum, Robert wrote:
>Hellooo,
>
>Me again with the 'orrible ISIS questions. Here goes.
>
>Scenario is as below.
>
>
>ROUTER A ------- ROUTER B ------ ROUTER C ------- ROUTER D -------- ROUTER E
>----- ROUTER F
>
>O.k. All routers are level 2 only i.e. all in different domains / areas.
>What I require is for Router C to be able to see D, E & F but not Router B
>and A.
>I need Router A & B to be able to see the full network.
>
>Oh Router C, D, E & F only run CLNS.
>
>My guess is to put an outbound access list of some sort onto Router B. BUT
>What type of access list. Is it a protocol type list? If so what protocol
>number should I use.
>
>I have tried various i.e. Make Router C a level 1 router --- result --- no
>adjacancy formed = no clns routes. Passive interface on Router B's
>connection = no adjacancy formed = no clns routes.
>
>Any help, ideas would be most welcome.
>
>_________________________________
>FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
>Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
_________________________________
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
