>Well, I believe that Cisco's take on this is that OSPF does not scale as >well for very large networks as does IS-IS. At least so sayeth an >instructor SE that I happen to know. > >Rik It depends on how you define "large." Neither will handle extremely large networks. Truly large networks use IGPs, BGPs, static routing, and perhaps a fair bit of layer 2 (and layer 2.5 things like MPLS). _________________________________ FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
- Re: IS-IS use?? Howard C. Berkowitz
- RE: IS-IS use?? Priscilla Oppenheimer
- Re: IS-IS use?? Jack Walker
- Re: IS-IS use?? Peter Van Oene
- RE: IS-IS use?? Howard C. Berkowitz
- RE: IS-IS use?? Howard C. Berkowitz
- RE: IS-IS use?? Rik Guyler
- RE: IS-IS use?? William Gragido
- RE: IS-IS use?? Howard C. Berkowitz
- Re: IS-IS use?? [gets O-T] Marty Adkins
- RE: IS-IS use?? Howard C. Berkowitz
- RE: IS-IS use?? Rik Guyler
- RE: IS-IS use?? Peter Van Oene
- RE: IS-IS use?? Spolidoro, Guilherme
- RE: IS-IS use?? Driessens.Hans
- RE: IS-IS use?? Brian Lodwick
- RE: IS-IS use?? Russ Meyer
- RE: IS-IS use?? Howard C. Berkowitz
- RE: IS-IS use?? Howard C. Berkowitz
- Re: IS-IS use?? Jack Walker
- Re: IS-IS use?? arthurx4

