----- Original Message -----
Sent: Monday, November 20, 2000 7:37
PM
Subject: RE: Failed CID
(640-025)....
I've said this before, but I'll rant again: this exam
sucks like a Hoover. It is, IMNSHO, not relevant to the real world. However,
the certification is nice to have, and Robert Padjen's (Sybex) Cisco
Internetwork Design is the best preparation for it that I've seen.
- Don
-----Original Message-----
From: Aaron
Moreau-Cook [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, November 20, 2000 7:22 PM
To: cisco
Subject: Failed CID
(640-025)....
Can anyone tell me why I need to care about SNA, IPX, Token
Ring, or ATM WAN
Switches in the CID Exam?
I was very disappointed in this exam, I've been reading this
exam sucked. It
really sucked when almost 20% of the
questions were SNA, 20% were Token
Ring.... I had a
few ATM WAN Switches, but I have never needed or seen one
before. Working at a content provider I don't have the luxury to order
a
strand of fiber and try to make a ATM network off of
it.
Question:
What is the backplane of the BGX ATM Switch Have?
a) 9.6 gbps
b) 1.2 gbps
c) 45 mbps
d) I have never seen a BGX
ATM Switch before.
Lame... Lame... Lame...
I'll be retaking this exam on Monday.
Score: 500/1000, 650 needed to pass.
_________________________________
FAQ,
list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
