I'm not sure if its conventional wisdom, but I would recommend that, based on my experience, there is little reason to use LANE, especially in a WAN setting. Layer 3 PVCs would provide a better solution. I would also note that most customers and vendors are leaving LANE in favor of other technologies. --- Tony van Ree <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Mak, > > We use a bit of LANE. When going from one part of > the state to another on ATM we can use VLAN's/ELAN's > and get the data across high speed links making the > sites appear as if they are in the one LAN. > > Teunis, > Hobart, Tasmania > Hobart > > > On Friday, December 01, 2000 at 12:27:19 AM, mak > wrote: > > > Hi all, > > > > It seems that LANE does not have much advantage. > > > > In what situation I need to / is better to use > LANE? > > > > Thanks > > > > Regards, > > mak > > > > _________________________________ > > FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: > http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html > > Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > > > > -- > www.tasmail.com > > > _________________________________ > FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: > http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html > Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] ===== Robert Padjen __________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Yahoo! Shopping - Thousands of Stores. Millions of Products. http://shopping.yahoo.com/ _________________________________ FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
