Getting traffic off the net in a somewhat balanced fashion is the easy part.  Finding 
a way to have equal amounts of it traverse multiple AS's and end up at two differing 
entry points into the AS is the stuff of GODS :)  

Pete


*********** REPLY SEPARATOR  ***********

On 12/4/2000 at 4:07 PM McCallum, Robert wrote:

>I would say yes.  All he needs is a policy which could say for example... if
>you try to go to microsoft go through 1 ISP and any other site through the
>other ISP.
>In all - BGP can do whatever you want it to do - whatever the companies
>policy is.
>No flames please.
>
>
>Robert McCallum CCNP CCDP
>CCIE Written R&S 2 days to go!
>CCIE Written Design 4 days to go!
>
>
>-----Original Message-----
>From: Schimek, Hans [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
>Sent: 04 December 2000 14:48
>To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'
>Subject: BGP Loadbalancing !
>
>
>my company is an internet-provider in austria.
>
>the following situation.
>one of our customers has his own network ( with own AS Number ) - currently 
>he is connected to another ISP. but plans to connect to our network soon..
>the problem in here is : if he connects to another ISP - he intends to do 
>loadbalancing across two ISP. 
>my question : is it possible to loadbalance across multiple ISPs.
>
> 
>----------------------------------NETWAY---------------------------------\
>ViennaInternetExchange
>CUSTOMER
>                                   -----------------------------------COLT
>TELECOM----------------------/
>
>
>
>thanx in advance
>   
>
>_________________________________
>FAQ, list archives, and subscription info:
>http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
>Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>_________________________________
>FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
>Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



_________________________________
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to