The only other way this configuration would work is if all of the ports were in the
same
bridge group.
TB
Devrin Gaskin wrote:
> I have a customer that sent me this ip addressing scheme:
> distant-end serial int :207.102.99.132
> their serial int :207.102.99.133
> their ethernet: 207.102.99.134
> host on their side:207.102.99.135
> all using the 255.255.255.192 mask
> When I try to use this addressing scheme on the router I get the error
> message that the subnets overlap. Why can't the lan and wan be on the same
> subnet? What are the ways around this?
>
> Devrin Gaskin
> E-mail [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> _________________________________
> FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
> Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
_________________________________
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
