dosen`t the route map USE the access list to get it`s address from???
i.e

router ospf 1
network 172.16.10.2 0.0.0.0 area 5
ip classless
access-list 1 permit 192.168.*.* *****
"this is created but needs to be called"

route-map griffy permit 10
match ip address 1
"this statement CALLS the access list into play"

(this is borrowed form Mr DOYLE ...appologies)

PLEASE correct me if i`m wrong list

still studying please bear with me...

regards

steve
>From: Andrew Larkins <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>Reply-To: Andrew Larkins <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>To: george <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Subject: RE: question on route map + access list on same interface
>Date: Fri, 26 Jan 2001 09:34:58 +0200
>
>I think that the access list should have priority
>
>-----Original Message-----
>From: george [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
>Sent: 26 January 2001 04:02
>To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Subject: question on route map + access list on same interface
>
>
>Theory question:
>If a route-map and an input acess list are on the same interface what is 
>the
>order of processing?
>1. Do packets go through the access list first then proccessed by route 
>map?
>2. Does the route-map go first and if so, do the packets then go to the
>access list for processing or are they just sent out the next interface
>bypassing the access list?
>
>
>
>
>_________________________________
>FAQ, list archives, and subscription info:
>http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
>Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>_________________________________
>FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: 
>http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
>Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]

_________________________________________________________________________
Get Your Private, Free E-mail from MSN Hotmail at http://www.hotmail.com.

_________________________________
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to