Duh ,
scrub that it doesn't work , it works really well when your stations are
dual homed though ; )
Kane
----- Original Message -----
From: "Kane" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Sheahan, Ryan" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; "'Fowler, Joey '"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Thursday, February 01, 2001 9:08 AM
Subject: Re: Ethernet switching
> In this scenario , it would also not matter what ip address you assigned
to
> the stations . ie: you could set one at 10.x.x.x /8 and the other at
> 192.x.x.x/28 and still get a ping response
>
> Kane
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Sheahan, Ryan" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: "'Fowler, Joey '" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Sent: Thursday, February 01, 2001 5:23 AM
> Subject: RE: Ethernet switching
>
>
> > These are my thoughts,
> >
> > If the switch was right out of the box, the stations could ping each
other
> > no matter what subnet mask you were using. The reason being, they are
> > located in the same broadcast domain, vlan1. This is the default vlan
for
> > all switched ports at this time. The first station would arp for the
> other,
> > it would get a response because they are on the same layer 2 broadcast
> > domain and they could speak directly using the switch.
> >
> > Switches by default with no mls, are layer two devices. They have no
> > concept of IP. They make decision based on layer 2 MAC addresses and
the
> > ports they are connected to. If these stations were in different vlans,
> the
> > situation would change. You then have created two broadcast domains and
> in
> > order for the devices to talk, a router or mls entry would be needed.
> >
> > Someone please correct me if I am wrong.
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Fowler, Joey
> > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Sent: 1/31/01 10:52 AM
> > Subject: RE: Ethernet switching
> >
> > Depends on the subnet mask you are using, for instance
> >
> > 142.102.3.1 with a subnet mask of 255.255.0.0
> > 142.102.2.1 also with a subnet of 255.255.0.0
> >
> > The 2.1 and 3.1 would be on the same subnet, however if you have a
> > different
> > subnet mask I don't think it would work.
> >
> > Joey
> >
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: alexs [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> > Sent: Saturday, September 09, 2000 7:42 AM
> > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Subject: Ethernet switching
> >
> >
> > Hello everyone,
> >
> > I have a question that probably will sound silly but here it is:
> > Suppose that you take a new 2924 out of the box and you plug in two
> > PC's.
> > You assign address, for example, 142.102.2.1 to the first one and
> > 142.102.3.1 to the second one.There is not any router in this small
> > network.142.102.2.1 tries to ping 142.102.3.1.The question is: will
> > 142.102.2.1 get a reply and why?
> > Thanks
> > alexs
> >
> >
> > _________________________________
> > FAQ, list archives, and subscription info:
> > http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
> > Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >
> > _________________________________
> > FAQ, list archives, and subscription info:
> > http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
> > Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >
> > _________________________________
> > FAQ, list archives, and subscription info:
> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
> > Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >
>
_________________________________
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
