If Cisco were to add-on to dot1q, how would it be able to communicate with
other non-Cisco routers using 802.1q?
>From: Chris Supino <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>Reply-To: Chris Supino <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>To: Jun Pati <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Subject: RE: ISL vs. 802.1Q
>Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2001 21:04:30 -0500
>
>Jun,
>
>Used to be that ISL supported a spanning-tree per VLAN, where Dot1q
>supported only a single spanning-tree. I was told at a seminar recently
>that
>Cisco has expanded the capabilities of their implementation of Dot1q, and
>it
>is now almost as fully featured as ISL, including supporting a
>spanning-tree
>per vlan. ISL is being phased out.
>
>Christopher Supino
>MCSE, MCP+I, CCNA, CNA Netware 5, Compaq ASE
>Senior Systems Engineer
>TransNet Corp.
>
>-----Original Message-----
>From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of
>Jun Pati
>Sent: Wednesday, January 31, 2001 7:29 PM
>To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Subject: ISL vs. 802.1Q
>
>
>What is the advantage of using ISL on an all-Cisco network compared to
>dot1Q
>aside from being able to handle frames larger than the ethernet mtu.
>
>
>_________________________________
>FAQ, list archives, and subscription info:
>http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
>Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>_________________________________
>FAQ, list archives, and subscription info:
>http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
>Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
_________________________________________________________________
Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at http://explorer.msn.com
_________________________________
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
