NAT like u said is a one to one translation between the external IP and the
internal one (at its purest form)
When u use NAT overloading u r also using PAT, hence u really cannot compare
the two....They work in cunjunction
I personally like to think of PAT as what most people refer to as NAT
&
I like to think of NAT as just a fancy term for IP Spoofing
""Richie, Nathan"" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> Can someone tell me any benefits to using NAT instead of PAT? I know with
> PAT, you can translate up to 64,000 addresses, but with NAT it is one to
> one.
>
> Thanks,
>
> Nathan Richie
>
> _________________________________
> FAQ, list archives, and subscription info:
http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
> Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
_________________________________
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
