There is at least one subtle difference between using dialer load-threshold with ppp multilink and without (or at least between using ppp multilink and using hdlc). It actually appears to be a different command, but with the same syntax. There is a bug that means that only outgoing load is used in the BoD calculations. This appears to be written up as a 'feature' in some of the doco (sorry, in a bit of a hurry and don't have time to look up the BugID or links - yell if you really want them and I'll chase them later). In other words, 'dialer load-threshold 150 either' will ignore the 'either' and just look at outgoing load. However, over ppp multilink, the 'inbound' and 'either' options do work. JMcL ---------------------- Forwarded by Jenny Mcleod/NSO/CSDA on 12/02/2001 03:56 pm --------------------------- "Adam Burgess" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>@groupstudy.com on 11/02/2001 08:04:03 pm Please respond to "Adam Burgess" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent by: [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: "Santosh Koshy" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> cc: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Subject: Re: PPP Multilink or Cisco BoD (Correction on Typo) Sorry - previous message should have read: Correct - although you don't need to specify 'ppp multilink' in order to bring up multiple channels, you only need to use 'dialer load-threshold'. This enables bandwidth on demand and seems to provide the same throughput and functionality as ppp multilink. If you specify dialer load-threshold AND ppp multilink, then the interfaces switches to 'industry standard' ppp multilink. I was curious if there were any benefits (ie. bandwidth utilisation, delay, CPU time, memory, etc) to be gained by using bandwidth on demand without ppp multilink. Adam > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Santosh Koshy" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Newsgroups: groupstudy.cisco > To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Sent: Sunday, February 11, 2001 3:46 PM > Subject: Re: PPP Multilink or Cisco BoD > > > > The dialer load-threshold feature, works in combination with ppp > > multilink... > > What "dialer load-threshold" does is, define the load level that must be > > exceeded on the first ISDN B channel before the router attempts to bring > up > > a second B channel for a multilink PPP connection. > > > > ""Adam Burgess"" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message > > 011001c093dd$116e7140$[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:011001c093dd$116e7140$[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > > > To all DDR gurus: > > > > > > Are there any benefits in using the Cisco Proprietary = > > > Bandwidth-on-Demand feature (ie. dialer load-threshold), rather than = > > > using ppp multilink (other than the fact the ppp multilink is standard)? > > > > > > Regards > > > > > > Adam Burgess > > > Brisbane, Australia > > > > > > _________________________________ > > > FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: > > http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html > > > Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > > > > > > _________________________________ > > FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: > http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html > > Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > _________________________________ > FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html > Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] > _________________________________ FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] _________________________________ FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]