I only use secondary interfaces as a means for migrating between IP
addressing schemes, but that's just me... They can come in handy when used
in multi-homed, non BGP environment...
I think sub-interfaces would make a really cool replacement...
Brant I. Stevens
Internetwork Solutions Engineer
Thrupoint, Inc.
545 Fifth Avenue, 14th Floor
New York, NY. 10017
646-562-6540
-----Original Message-----
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of
Leigh Anne Chisholm
Sent: Monday, February 12, 2001 3:34 PM
To: Nabil Fares; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: Sub-interfaces and Secondary interfaces
One disadvantage of using secondary interfaces is that Cisco has indicated
secondary interface support will disappear in future IOS releases, in favour
of supporting subinterface configurations.
-----Original Message-----
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of
Nabil Fares
Sent: February 12, 2001 1:04 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Sub-interfaces and Secondary interfaces
Greetings all,
Which way do you guys recommend using in Ethernet environment if I have
multiple subnets? Are there any advantages/disadvantages for using one over
the other?.
Thanks,
Nabil
_________________________________
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info:
http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
_________________________________
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info:
http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
_________________________________
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
