Are there other benchmarks for ACLs? I'm revisiting my config and
want it just so...
--- Brian Lodwick <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I really enjoyed this link and appreciate your reply, for everyone
> else read
> through this article this link goes for a nice look at different
> switching
> types.
> http://www.nwc.com/1004/1004ws2.html
>
>
> >From: "Howard C. Berkowitz" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> >Reply-To: "Howard C. Berkowitz" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> >To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >Subject: Re: BPX going out of style?
> >Date: Wed, 14 Feb 2001 10:30:27 -0500
> >
> > >John Nemeth said,
> >
> >
> > >On Jul 6, 1:28pm, "Brian Lodwick" wrote:
> > >}
> > >} I have heard many tales of how ATM will explode soon, will be
> >partenered
> > >} perfectly with DSL, and everyone will implement it, but I just
> haven't
> >seen
> > >} it. I like the idea of improving technologies your engineering
> and
> >support
> > >} staff are familiar with (Not counting new technology with old
> names
> >like
> > >} IPv6). I hope this is able to work out, and isn't too far down
> the
> >road.
> > >
> > > IPv6 is coming. There are just too many shortcomings in
> IPv4 that
> > >can't be solved using hacks. The biggest being the lack of
> address
> > >space. It really isn't a question of "if" but rather "when".
> >
> >Some of the "killer apps" that have moved IPv6 into high gear
> include
> >the decision by the third generation wireless people to use V6 as
> >their basic protocol, which, as we speak, is being built into
> >handsets.
> >
> > >
> > >} Is there any talk of using smaller tags in IP to create big
> pipes
> >similar to
> > >} ATM's VCI's so that you could lower the ip address &
> mask-lookup
> >processor
> > >} overhead on backbone IP routers? I think this would be a neat
> idea.
> >Even
> > >
> > > You've just described MPLS.
> > >
> > >} though the CAM table is fast the router must still read the
> entire
> >address
> > >} and mask. Small pipe identifiers could be inserted into the ip
> header
> >and
> > >} extracted at the gateways and lookup would be lowered. Like
> xtags on
> >VLANS.
> > >
> > > IP headers are only 20 bytes and aren't much of a problem.
> The
> > >real problem is with compression, encryption, access lists, etc.
> Check
> > >out this URL for a study on what happens when access lists are
> used:
> > >http://www.nwc.com/1004/1004ws2.html
> > >
> > >}-- End of excerpt from "Brian Lodwick"
> >
> >_________________________________
> >FAQ, list archives, and subscription info:
> >http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
> >Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> _________________________________________________________________
> Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at http://explorer.msn.com
>
> _________________________________
> FAQ, list archives, and subscription info:
> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
> Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Get personalized email addresses from Yahoo! Mail - only $35
a year! http://personal.mail.yahoo.com/
_________________________________
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
