>Are there other benchmarks for ACLs? I'm revisiting my config and
>want it just so...
I think the Tolly Group has some.
>
>
>
>--- Brian Lodwick <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> I really enjoyed this link and appreciate your reply, for everyone
>> else read
>> through this article this link goes for a nice look at different
>> switching
>> types.
>> http://www.nwc.com/1004/1004ws2.html
>>
>>
>> >From: "Howard C. Berkowitz" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>> >Reply-To: "Howard C. Berkowitz" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>> >To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>> >Subject: Re: BPX going out of style?
>> >Date: Wed, 14 Feb 2001 10:30:27 -0500
>> >
>> > >John Nemeth said,
>> >
>> >
>> > >On Jul 6, 1:28pm, "Brian Lodwick" wrote:
>> > >}
>> > >} I have heard many tales of how ATM will explode soon, will be
>> >partenered
>> > >} perfectly with DSL, and everyone will implement it, but I just
>> haven't
>> >seen
>> > >} it. I like the idea of improving technologies your engineering
>> and
>> >support
>> > >} staff are familiar with (Not counting new technology with old
>> names
>> >like
>> > >} IPv6). I hope this is able to work out, and isn't too far down
>> the
>> >road.
>> > >
>> > > IPv6 is coming. There are just too many shortcomings in
>> IPv4 that
>> > >can't be solved using hacks. The biggest being the lack of
>> address
>> > >space. It really isn't a question of "if" but rather "when".
>> >
>> >Some of the "killer apps" that have moved IPv6 into high gear
>> include
>> >the decision by the third generation wireless people to use V6 as
>> >their basic protocol, which, as we speak, is being built into
>> >handsets.
>> >
>> > >
>> > >} Is there any talk of using smaller tags in IP to create big
>> pipes
>> >similar to
>> > >} ATM's VCI's so that you could lower the ip address &
>> mask-lookup
>> >processor
>> > >} overhead on backbone IP routers? I think this would be a neat
>> idea.
>> >Even
>> > >
>> > > You've just described MPLS.
>> > >
>> > >} though the CAM table is fast the router must still read the
>> entire
>> >address
>> > >} and mask. Small pipe identifiers could be inserted into the ip
>> header
>> >and
>> > >} extracted at the gateways and lookup would be lowered. Like
>> xtags on
>> >VLANS.
>> > >
>> > > IP headers are only 20 bytes and aren't much of a problem.
>> The
>> > >real problem is with compression, encryption, access lists, etc.
>> Check
>> > >out this URL for a study on what happens when access lists are
>> used:
>> > >http://www.nwc.com/1004/1004ws2.html
>> > >
>> > >}-- End of excerpt from "Brian Lodwick"
>> >
>> >_________________________________
>> >FAQ, list archives, and subscription info:
>> >http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
>> >Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to
>> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>
>> _________________________________________________________________
>> Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at http://explorer.msn.com
>>
>> _________________________________
>> FAQ, list archives, and subscription info:
>> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
>> Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to
>[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>
>__________________________________________________
>Do You Yahoo!?
>Get personalized email addresses from Yahoo! Mail - only $35
>a year! http://personal.mail.yahoo.com/
>
>_________________________________
>FAQ, list archives, and subscription info:
>http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
>Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
_________________________________
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
