I think one has to assume that there is reachability via some means between the two
routers. Sam indicates at the beginning of the section that only relevant snippets of
configs will be posted in each example and in this case I expect there are missing
items both on F and the intermediary E. You definitely have accurately pointed out
that for multi-hop to work, one naturally requires IP reachability between the peers.
Pete
*********** REPLY SEPARATOR ***********
On 2/25/2001 at 1:40 PM Bradley J. Wilson wrote:
>Take a look at Halabi (First Edition) p. 300, and riddle me this regarding
>Figure 10-1:
>
>How does network 192.68.12.0 get into RTF's routing table? The EBGP session
>needs to be established before RTF can accept any routes from RTD. But how
>can the session be established before RTF knows how to route packets to RTD?
>
>The only thing I can think of would be a static route. There really is no
>feasible way to run an IGP between RTF and that network. However, Halabi
>doesn't include a static route in his configuration.
>
>(And if someone wants to post which page this is in the Second Edition,
>please do. I'm thinking about buying it, but I'm too cheap at this point.
>;-)
>
>BJ
>
>
>
>
>_________________________________
>FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
>Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
_________________________________
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
