They are probably just using them for interfaces. Indeed they should be
filtered though.
andy
On Sun, 25 Feb 2001, Ddddd Rrrrrrrr wrote:
> This is odd, what's next -- dogs and cats living together? Complete anarchy?
> :-)
>
>
> I did a traceroute to one of US West's customers... got some interesting
> results:
>
> 13 206 ms 179 ms 123 ms gig0-0-0.phnx-sust1.phnx.uswest.net
> [206.80.192.253]
> 14 1016 ms 151 ms 975 ms 207.224.191.2
> 15 233 ms 124 ms 123 ms 192.168.8.1
> 16 151 ms 179 ms 123 ms 192.168.100.147
> 17 247 ms 192 ms 151 ms vdsl-130-13-102-120.phnx.uswest.net
> [130.13.102.120]
>
> RFC 1918 - "Address Allocation for Private Internets" indicates 192.168.0.0
> through 192.168.255.255 (192.168/16 prefix) is reserved
> for private internets. Hops 15 and 16 in my traceroute show that addresses
> within this range are being used publically.
>
> Did I miss something? Have the "for private use only" IP addresses now been
> given the green light to be used within the internet?
>
>
> -- Leigh Anne
>
>
>
>
> _________________________________
> FAQ, list archives, and subscription info:
> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
> Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> _________________________________________________________________
> Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at http://explorer.msn.com
>
> _________________________________
> FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
> Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
_________________________________
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
