At 02:15 PM 2/26/01, nobody wrote:
>Is the below a dumb question?
No.
>Nobody replied. Can somebody enlighten me? ;-)
>
>p.
>
>----- Original Message -----
>From: "nobody" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>Sent: Friday, February 23, 2001 2:07 PM
>Subject: need clarification: ip unnumbered in routing tables
>
>
> > just need to verify my thinking:
> >
> > example: serial line (PPP) connection between routers A and B using ip
> > unnumbered.
> >
> > router A:
> > e0=192.168.1.1/24
> > s0=192.168.3.1/24
Why does s0 have an address if it's unnumbered?
> >
> > routing table for A:
> > c 192.168.1.0/24 is directly connected, ethernet0
> > r 192.168.2.0/24 [120/1] via 192.168.3.2, 00:00:05, serial0
> > s* 0.0.0.0/0 is directly connected, serial0
> >
> > router B:
> > e0=192.168.2.1/24
> > s0=192.168.3.2/24
> >
> > routing table B:
> > r 192.168.1.0/24 [120/1] via 192.168.3.2, 00:00:06, serial0
> > c 192.168.2.0/24 is directly connected, ethernet0
> > s* 0.0.0.0/0 is directly connected, serial0
> >
> > i thought that the routing table should reflect the ethernet ip address of
> > the remote router on local serial interface?
It will reflect the next hop, unless it really is unnumbered, but it
appears to be numbered. What am I missing?
Priscilla
>i don't see it here. is it an
> > error or is it me?
> >
> > thanx,
> >
> > p.
> >
>
>_________________________________
>FAQ, list archives, and subscription info:
>http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
>Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
________________________
Priscilla Oppenheimer
http://www.priscilla.com
_________________________________
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
