Is the below a dumb question?
Nobody replied. Can somebody enlighten me? ;-)
p.
----- Original Message -----
From: "nobody" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Friday, February 23, 2001 2:07 PM
Subject: need clarification: ip unnumbered in routing tables
> just need to verify my thinking:
>
> example: serial line (PPP) connection between routers A and B using ip
> unnumbered.
>
> router A:
> e0=192.168.1.1/24
> s0=192.168.3.1/24
>
> routing table for A:
> c 192.168.1.0/24 is directly connected, ethernet0
> r 192.168.2.0/24 [120/1] via 192.168.3.2, 00:00:05, serial0
> s* 0.0.0.0/0 is directly connected, serial0
>
> router B:
> e0=192.168.2.1/24
> s0=192.168.3.2/24
>
> routing table B:
> r 192.168.1.0/24 [120/1] via 192.168.3.2, 00:00:06, serial0
> c 192.168.2.0/24 is directly connected, ethernet0
> s* 0.0.0.0/0 is directly connected, serial0
>
> i thought that the routing table should reflect the ethernet ip address of
> the remote router on local serial interface? i don't see it here. is it an
> error or is it me?
>
> thanx,
>
> p.
>
_________________________________
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
