Larry Lamb wrote:
>
> Well what type of router are you looking to deploy? This will significantly
> influence your decision on what type of routing/connectivity that you'll
> use. Full BGP tables can chew up a lot of memory. Looking a the Mae-East
> Looking Glass at Digex, they're using almost 30MB. That's going to require
> a router with 64MB more like 128MB of memory.
second is true.
64 Mb isn't enough already since several months ago.
> A lot of this type of
> configuration will be covered in Internet Routing Architectures by Halabi.
> It's a Cisco Press title.
Generally, I would want to say that answer for the question needs real knowledge
about several internetworking area.
What about propagating of [sub]networks? Whom and what?
What about negotiating with both ISP about policy routing and other staff?
(I have some experience with working in a ISP as system engineer and can say
that it isn't so easy)
So, resume is (IMHO): theoretically it is possible of course.
But in practice.... let's say, it is not easy so far...
CHEERS, ;-)
OLEH
>
> "Atul Kumar Udupi" wrote in message <97o0uf$pmu$[EMAIL PROTECTED]>...
> >can u give me some more info please
> >
> >
> >"Larry Lamb" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
> >97o0hs$p33$[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:97o0hs$p33$[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> >> Yep, you can do a lot of different things with routing as well depending
> >on
> >> the memory available, etc. Full BGP from both, full BGP from one with a
> >> floating static route, etc.
> >>
> >> "Atul Kumar Udupi" wrote in message <97nsnb$gr8$[EMAIL PROTECTED]>...
> >> >Greetings,
> >> > Hello All I would like to know , Is there any way to terminate 2
> >ISP's
> >> >on a same cisco router and use them as a redundant link.
> >> >
_________________________________
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
