Navin Parwal <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
985jc4$ac$[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:985jc4$ac$[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> Hi ,
>        My network design is as follows :
>   I have two 2610 routers which are interconnected , on the first router
> (Cisco2610) the configuration is as follows :
>

when you post your interface addresses, please post the subnet masks, too

>  1) Serial0/0- Ip address 192.168.1.1
>     Ethernet 10.100.10.1
>
> On the second router (cisco2620) the configurations are as follows :
>
>   2) Serial0/0 - 192.168.1.2
>      Ethernet - 200.100.10.1
>
>   I am able to successfully set the static route from the first router to
> the second router by giving the command :
>    ip route 200.100.10.0 255.255.255.0 192.168.1.2
>  and ping the interfaces on the side of ethernet of 200.100.10.1
>
>   but when I give the command for the second router ie.
>   ip route 10.100.10.1 255.0.0.0 192.168.1.1 , I get an error which states
> as follows :
>    " % Inconsistent address and mask  " and I am unable to ping to
> 193.168.0.1
>
> why am I getting this error and how can I correct this error .

the mask you're using is a network mask for the 10.0.0.0 network, so either
change the mask to 255.255.255.255 or set your network route and subnet maks
properly.  For example, if your Ethernet on Router 1 is

ethernet 0
ip address 10.100.10.1 255.255.255.0

then your corresponding static route on Router 2 is
ip route 10.100.10.0 255.255.255.0 192.168.1.1



>   I can sucessfully set up my routing tables dynamically using either RIP
or
> IGRP , but I am unable to do so statically
>    Will I have to change any configurations on the second router.
> thanks in advance .
>
> Navin Parwal
>
>
>
> _________________________________
> FAQ, list archives, and subscription info:
http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
> Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


_________________________________
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to