Koliy,
Please send messages to the whole list, not me.
I was assuming the services were central, but after sending the reply I
realized they could be at the remote sites. If the services are at the
remote sites and nobody else needs them, filter there.
You also asked about service 2000. I've never heard of that one. But search
in Google for a list of SAPs and that will help.
As I mentioned before, I am sick today, and I've been rather busy
interviewing Fabio, so please be patient if my messages aren't helpful. &;-)
Priscilla
At 01:40 PM 3/8/01, Priscilla Oppenheimer wrote:
>You will probably want to do as much filtering as possible at the central
>site. 6000 SAPs will overrun a 56-K line.
>
>But before you do that, you need to determine which services are needed
>where. Filtering SAPs will make servers and printers unreachable. This may
>be fine, especially for the printers, but it might not be. You have to do
>some research on what the services are and who needs them.
>
>Good luck!
>
>Priscilla
>
>At 04:32 PM 3/8/01, KOLIY wrote:
> >I am responsible for design a IPX network... We have a a 56k line
> >connects remote sites and there are about 6000 IPX services on a network
> >where would should I filter the saps at? the central router or the remote
> >router?
> >thanks
> >Koliy
> >
> >
> >____________________________________________________________________
> >Get free email and a permanent address at http://www.netaddress.com/?N=1
>
>
>________________________
>
>Priscilla Oppenheimer
>http://www.priscilla.com
>
>_________________________________
>FAQ, list archives, and subscription info:
>http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
>Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
________________________
Priscilla Oppenheimer
http://www.priscilla.com
_________________________________
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
