Another difference between a used car salesman and a router sales droid is
that the used car salesman knows how to drive his product.

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Howard C. Berkowitz [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Friday, March 16, 2001 6:06 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: Cisco share in downfall
> 
> 
> >With all this Juniper stuff flying around, I remind you all to 
> >consider that core routing represents something like 16% of Cisco's 
> >revenue stream and Juniper only make core routers.
> >
> >Pete
> 
> 
> Putting on my chef's hat, I have several tools that variously remove 
> apple cores, leaving the rest intact, or also slice the remaining 
> part.  Does this mean that Victorinox, Sabatier, etc., are 
> significant players in the core market?
> 
> Those ...routers...that also slice the fruit into segments, clearly, 
> are distributed edge processors in the same housing as the core 
> router.
> 
> As far as the charges and countercharges about the Lightreading 
> tests, the Master of Networks asked the Novice,
> 
>     "Grasshopper, what is the difference between a seller of used cars
>      and a networking marketdroid?"
> 
>     "I know not, sensei. Enlighten me."
> 
>     "The seller of used cars knows when he is lying."
> 
> In a different current controversy, one wonders if new.net has any 
> conception of the operational impact their product may have. See 
> continuing flames on NANOG.
> 
> It may be necessary to bring in a mediator to deal with the question 
> of whether Cisco is faster than Juniper, or vice versa.  Perhaps Bill 
> Clinton can help explain the meaning of "is" in this context.
> 
> _________________________________
> FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: 
> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
> Report misconduct 
> and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> 

_________________________________
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to