Hi Amit,
be aware of the following:
If your total one-way delay is more than 300 ms, your quality will probably
be quite bad. As you mentionned delay happens due to queuing, therefore
prioritization is necessary, but also from the compression delay, the
bandwidth (serialization delay), and the transmission delay. Transmission
delay is not a very big part for terrestrial links, but be carefull with
satellite links!!
If you tell me it is already implemented I'd like to have your comment on
the quality.
Fragmentation is also a feature that you can implement, to prevent large
data packets to keep small voice packets waiting behind them.
Ciao
Laurent
>From: Amit Gupta <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>Reply-To: Amit Gupta <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>CC: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED],
>[EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Subject: QOS for VoIP Traffic
>Date: Tue, 20 Mar 2001 05:36:04 -0800 (PST)
>
>Hi All,
>
>I am using VoIP over a satellite link.
>
>I am planning to configure some queuing mechanism on
>the router which can provide dedicated bw to voice
>traffic and at the same time use the entire bw for
>data traffic when no traffic from higher priority
>flows is available( voice )
>
>Please send me your suggestions and comments on any
>other feature that I can enable to improve quality.
>
>Thanks & regards
>
>Amit
>
>
>
>__________________________________________________
>Do You Yahoo!?
>Get email at your own domain with Yahoo! Mail.
>http://personal.mail.yahoo.com/
>
>_________________________________
>FAQ, list archives, and subscription info:
>http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
>Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
_________________________________________________________________________
Get Your Private, Free E-mail from MSN Hotmail at http://www.hotmail.com.
_________________________________
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
