If you are running EIGRP as your routing protocol, it will take care of the
load balancing for you without the added complexity and CPU overhead of PPP
multilink.
There are some great EIGRP config guides on CCO.
Chris Lemagie
-----Original Message-----
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of
Brian
Sent: Tuesday, March 20, 2001 1:57 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Multiple T1's
On each end, static route traffic out both interfaces.
Bri
"Jason Stephens" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
998ndv$1fh$[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:998ndv$1fh$[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> We have a situation where we want to have 2 t1's going to another office.
We
> want these 2 t1's to not
> only provide redundancy in case 1 goes down, but also want them to load
> balance while they are both up.
> So basically, we want the two t1's to be up providing 3 mpbs of bandwidth
> and if one goes down for it
> to automatically send all traffic to the t1 that is still up. We have 3600
> series routers on both ends. Can
> this be done? If so, please explain how. I looked into the Multilink PPP
> stuff, but it seems to be only for
> async ports. Thanks for any info in advance!
>
>
> _________________________________
> FAQ, list archives, and subscription info:
http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
> Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
_________________________________
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info:
http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
_________________________________
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
