Ah, good point. If these were global DLCIs then his assumption would be
correct. That didn't occur to me since I haven't heard of anyone
actually using global DLCIs.
>>> "Steve Smith" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 3/21/01 10:33:31 AM >>>
If they are doing global addressing then YES!
-----Original Message-----
From: John Gotti [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, March 21, 2001 11:13 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Question regarding DLCI's...
Hi all...quick question; We have 4 offices, NY, Chicago, Stamford and
San=20
Francisco, we just got our T1 turned on and will have a point to
point=20
Frame-Relay connection between all of us in a Hub & Spoke topology
with=20
Stamford being the Hub. The question I have is, our Frame-relay
provider
gaves us the following DLCI's; NY-104, CH-101, SF-103 and=20
Stamford-100...When your configuring each locations' router, am I
correct in=20
assuming all the remote routers will have DLCI 100 pointing them to
Stamford=20
and Stamford would have 4 entries each with the remotes' respective
DLCI's?=20
Does this make sense? Thanks a bunch!
JG
_________________________________________________________________
Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at http://explorer.msn.com
_________________________________
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info:
http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
_________________________________
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info:
http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
_________________________________
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
